Hi, Just wanted to point out that Way: 1434484063 doesn't look like a residential plot, no dwelling, though I could be wrong.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Have the woods really been permanently removed?

Regards Bernard.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Youve made a few duplicated highways which could cause disruption to routing. I think I've removed the duplicate. Please try not to do this.

Regards Bernard.

House drawn as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Building is added with tags and address amended to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The address 5 Laurel Grove is included in the building outline tags, addr:housenumber=1-25
addr:interpolation=odd
So the additional node was duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Sorry I made this comment to the wrong changeset.

Hi, On the Cambridgeshire map, a footpath is shown between and to the back of the garages.

That's done!
Regards Bernard.

I've removed the Coop brand and operator tags.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've mapped the whole building as the business, it was previously described as a house. So the question is does the business really occupy the whole building? If not then the business should be represented by a node/POI placed within the house outline. I would think it's actually a contact office, I can help with this if you like.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Several highway sections of the park run were placed on top of existing highways. This made duplication of highways that could cause disruption of routing. I've removed the duplicate sections and amended the route relation to suit.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The pub is already mapped as an outline of the premises, Way: The Regal (1204234283). I've removed the POI as it's duplication of data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You inadvertently squared up the long boundary line Way: 449518772. I've reinstated it to the original position so all is well.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just wanted to point out, in case you missed it, that there are several problems in this changeset as noted in the warnings above. I've removed several sections of duplicated cycleway which could have impacted on routing. I've not looked at the other problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The church building is alreaddy mapped so I've added you new tags to it. OSM policy is "One feature, one OSM element", please see:- osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM maps ground truth, what is physically present at a place, and it must be verifiable to others who pass by. So I wonder, is there actually a language school here or is it an office in the bungalow? I can see no evidence of a school.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The business doesn't occupy the whole building, so I've reverted the building tags. I added the tag office=financial to your POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Good start to your mapping, that's actually two houses, I've amended.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I made several alterations to your added footpaths mainly to conform to OSM best practice. There were many crossing but unjoined highways, (footpaths crossing over existing highways unjoined), all fixed. Many places where footpaths joined onto land area outlines, (residential and building area outlines), all fixed.

Regards Bernard.