Hi, thanks for fixing the note.
It might be worth having a look at https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=15/55.8431/-4.2806&basemap=osm-mapnik&categories=car_maxspeed to see more missing speed limits, if you are able to survey the area :)

Is this path (and others nearny) actually a cycleway? way/724000965/history

Hi, just wondering what the reason is for adding foot=yes to all these footways?

Shouldn't there be a lifecycle prefix or something as this railway doesn't exist?

Why did you remove the motor_vehicle=no tag?

Isn't that a duplicate of node/5667504621 ?

Hi, not sure if you are aware, but there is an OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer which can be turned on to help you align background layers to the blue lines - in this area the offset is small but in other places Bing needs to be adjusted so map data isn't out of alignment. :)

What is barrier=coupre? node/11955881547

Hi, not sure why you changed these mini roundabouts but this has been reverted.

Well for now the one thing we cannot do is remove the segment entirely leaving no connection to Leith Walk, so I've added it back but as a footway without one of the kerbs.

Hi, assume you removed it by mistake - I've added the building tag back on here: way/536129047 :)

Hi, is this living street actually signed as a such, ie a home zone?
way/1309062369

Hi, the buildings with two housenumbers should either be split or two separate nodes added for each number (as 1/2 is not the actual address) and also addr:housename should be used instead for those with names. :)

hopefully you've reported them to the council or Sustrans etc :)

Hi, thanks for your recent edits and notes fixing. Not sure if you are aware, but there is an OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer which can be turned on to help you align background layers to the blue lines - in this area the offset is small but in other places Bing needs to be adjusted so map data isn't out of alignment. :)

what is your source for these names?

you've added three shop=car areas which are duplicating the individual buildings, think one or the other should be removed?

Is way/1159981713 definitely one way, as you surely must be able to exit from the cycle path there?

I'm assuming you didn't meant to change this to a one way path? way/359808819/history

Is there a reason why you removed the tags from the building and added a node instead? way/1075423806/history