Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177354940 | The two residential roads you added are not shown on the Whatcom County tax parcel viewer. See https://www.whatcomcounty.us/2979/Map-Portal They may be just driveways.
|
|
| 177354940 | The two residential roads you added are not shown on the Whatcom County tax parcel viewer. See https://www.whatcomcounty.us/2979/Map-Portal They may be just driveways.
|
|
| 177355532 | #TIP: leave the address when removing buildings. The address is often reused. I added it back. Thanks for removing the bldgs.
|
|
| 177355650 | Hint - try either ESRI World Imagery or Mapbox. Both are more current than Bing.
|
|
| 177355854 | I'm currious why you move the pickle ball node to the middle of the area. The entrance is at the north end of that part of the mall.
|
|
| 177274987 | This looks like an import but it doesn't show up on the import catagogue. May need reverting.
|
|
| 177254849 | It has been fixed
|
|
| 177254849 | It has been fixed
|
|
| 177254849 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. You removed the traffic_signals tag which lets people know that their is a traffic signal ahead
|
|
| 177239789 | #TIP: use the tag addr:unit to add the suite number. Can you fix this? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 177113963 | Sorry, but use of Google imagery and maps is not allowed by Google for use in OSM. It is copyrighted prohibited. |
|
| 177230821 | Why are you changing footways to paths. The wiki highway=path clearly shows what a path should look like. This is a footway, see highway=footway
|
|
| 177228299 | You were ahead of me. Thanks for updating the tag. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 177208329 | Check out landuse=brownfield or landuse=construction for a more appropriate tag
|
|
| 177206963 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Just a note that Google's license prohibits it use in OSM. Since you modified the rock from imagery, I'm assuming that you use the imagery to identify the road.
|
|
| 177142980 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 177113963 | No, what I'm saying is that SEO edits are notorious for bad quality. I do find it interesting that both businesses show up on a web search at that address. Both have pictures of what appear to be the same building. |
|
| 177123169 | I changed this to landuse=commercial since there is no wooded area. You could add the wooded area. I typically get a large area and tag it natural=wood so I can be areas that are logged and areas that are not designated for logging. Let me know if you need help.
|
|
| 177123060 | Again, we don't use descriptive names. You could add the name to the building where the business is located.
|
|
| 177122925 | Driveways should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. We also don't add descriptive names. Can you correct the tagging and remove the descriptive name?
|