OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
178118466

Nice. One suggestion, square bldgs by selecting the outlline and then type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178118466

178150730

Why did you end the residential road and change it to a pedestrian route? From the imagery, it appers they connect. I does look like a crossing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178150730

178077675

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

FYI, there is an app, DeFlock which makes it easy to added these surveillance devices.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178077675

178076901

Is this a new. From the latest imagery, it looks like the old structures were demolished. Someone added a bldg, but it's 6 years old. But if it's correct, you can merge your node with the building outline. Of the bldg is gone, it should be removed from OSM. (Select the outline then delete it.)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178076901

115580280

I was dealing with an issue given to DWG and noticed this track you touched a few years back. openstreetmap.org/way/76130888. It doesn't seem to be on any imagery. Not your doing but there is also an archaeological site nearby but it doesn't show on the imagery. Should it be on OpenHistoricalMap?

177201540

Thanks for catching that. Fixed

177988187

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177988187

177872932

なぜ交差ノードを削除したのか気になります。node/760655295/history をご覧ください。説明していただけますか。

English:
I'm curious why you removed the crossing node. See node/10760655295/history Can you explain.

177878694

Great news. I'll drive by in the next couple of days to get some street view imagery.

177906124

Is "Illegal Dirtbike trail" the acutal name or just what it is?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177906124

177872654

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I reverted you fake entry. Please don't vandalise OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177872654

177870331

#TIP: Also remove the old business tags, like the ones for Taco Time. I went ahead and removed them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177870331

177878694

Some of the crossings you added don't exist on the imagery. Adding these can impact people with limited mobility, such as those using wheelchairs. Washington State has a large community of mappers trying to map sidewalks to help those people. Check out osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Schema for a lot of detail on how ot map sidewalks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177878694

177779575

For public bus stops we typically match exactly what the bus company uses. Can you verify it use the expanded version?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177779575

177779874

Is the house actually named 1412? In osm we don't use descriptive names, the tags, in this case the housenumber tag, is sufficient.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177779874

177751597

I think this should be tagged as tourism=viewpoint as a node. Also, I think this is actually part of Lake Washington Blvd park at least according to the city. You might want to look into expanding the park.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177751597

177751421

You added a polygon on top of the existing parking lot polygon. I removed the duplicate but saved you name and opening hours
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177751421

177751267

beaches are normally added as polygons (areas) and not nodes. The tag should be natural=beach + name. Can you revisit this edit? I'll send more info on OSM in a message
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177751267

177771524

The apparent owner of the removed building wrote to us at the DWG. We are trying to understand why it was removed. Can you help us understand, because there is a strong sentiment to add it back?

177752285

Why did you tag this a layer=-1? It doesn't appear to be undergound, expecially since it connect to roads at each end of the way. Can you review this edit please.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177752285