Whatever the hell you did here, it was vandalism to the map. To do things like this, try OpenGeoFiction.

Just a notice if you ever read this, springs (and other things with feature types) should not be named what their feature type is (or as something like "unnamed spring"), as that would be putting it in twice unnecessarily. I'm going to try to rectify mapping practices like this, but I'm not perfect. So contact me with any questions.
Thanks,
I-76

Just a notice if you ever read this, cell towers (and other things with feature types) should not be named what their feature type is, as that would be putting it in twice unnecessarily. I'm going to try to rectify mapping practices like this, but I'm not perfect. So contact me with any questions.
Thanks,
I-76

Please comment on this changeset if you'd like to speak about it.

The reason this changeset is so short is because I was showing somebody how Rapid works.

Now I fixed it (forgot to submit the changeset till now)

Looks like you created 3 of them on top of each other! I fixed it for you.

Understood, thanks for explaining!

I figured something like that, I just noticed the sheer size of the changeset.

Also first Rapid changeset!

how big was your survey??!

Looks a lot better.

Hello and welcome to OSM's iD editor!
I'm a little suspicious of where you placed these businesses, as they are right in the road centerline. Did you use anonymous onosm notes that have been untrustworthy for years in Iran? If not, what were your sources?
Thanks,
Theman76

Congrats!

some very weird things here...

1. sidewalks are different from pedestrian streets

2. DO NOT name things what they are

Thanks.

Thanks!

viewpoint should not be named

NO abbreviations (see private rd.)

specify what kind of football is played so feature type can agree

baseball fields should be separate I think...