Please read your own changesets if you know how to comment changeset/179184501

Rendering can abuse and add `=earth_bank` + `anthropogenic=yes`

`=embankment` doesn't mean any non-sharp slopes, but land raised to above. This is a cut slope. along the original mountains. There are some `man_made=cutting`

Is it not `trail_visibility=no` , `disused=yes` , `abandoned:highway=` , or scrambling?

Please don't upload personal test edits. This is considered vandalism.

Should use `=busway` (despite Carto not rendering)

However it's misleading, showing the `=marked` flaw. Those yellow stripes are not statutory, meaning they have no legal effects. They should not be confused with signalized, or white ones.

1. This is self-contradictory to use `tourism=attraction`
2. There's not one "the trail". There can be many routes, where others are free to climb or cut through.

1. Unprefixed `website=` is used for unique pages of the feature specifically, eg branches, where `brand:website=` will be used for domain of brands
2. Almost all roads don't have `website=`
3. This is for the project, not the road when opened
4. This is already attempted as `project:website=`
5. Most of the `landuse=construction` refer to Lion Rock Tunnel Rd, Tai Chung Kiu Rd, and the intersection

changeset/178905889

`=driveway` is an internal "private" road that needs to have parts inside site/lot. It shouldn't be a public street.

Why is there a `=driveway` ? PERW is not a internal road. Frontage lanes/roadways should still use `=residential` / `=unclassified`

You can read the wiki, or the post https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/solving-the-dreaded-access-dismount-problem/134288

`maxheight=` is enough, no `bus=`

`=permit` means usually granted permits, so certain ones allowed only should be `=private`

1. Desire crossing routes are not drawn. You can freely cross without drawing this.
2. Don't add plain `highway=crossing` for this either

2. "Single-track access road" should use `lane_markings=no` + `passing_places=yes` etc. `highway=` is functionality, not physical layout.

I treated this as a gyratory with `=secondary` + `junction=circular` (but was removed)

`change=no` and `give_way:lanes=` has already been used. `highway:lanes=` is another option. `wait:lanes=` was rejected for a few reason.

We have discussed them as being pedestrianized. The next option is `=track` only. `=service` for facility and sites is not the most perfect for entire country parks, perhaps except around reservoirs.