all entries were checked manually

hmm, maybe these should not be edited under this justification

moved to "needs approval list", checked all four edited

Hello! way/1243979120/history has shop = épicerie that was added in this edit
shop=épicerie ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from shop=* or osm.wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

and thanks for cleaning up that name:de !

I was unsure where to start with that one

stacja kolejowa "Warszawa Zamienie" nie istnieje i jest kompletną fikcją, zgadza się?

wycofuje changeset/180030926

node/13657128893 to bzdura i wymysł, prawda?

thanks!

fixes changeset/180067630

fixed in changeset/180074373

also, removed bogus name:de

way/1330726079/history - something went really wrong here, I will fix it

ale widzę że ban na dodawanie name:de wszedł, więc dyskusja jest już zbędna

osm.org/user_blocks/20010

> czy ktoś używa tej nazwy w języku niemieckim obecnie

to za mało

jak ja używam sobie z kolegami nazwę Ciaciaracia na Berlin to nie uzasadnia dodania tego

> Nie, weryfikowalne oznacza że są jakieś źródła że taka nazwa istnieje i jest używana. Nie musi to być oficjalne źródło, wystarczy artykuł albo wywiad - cokolwiek.

weryfikowalność w postaci zapytania ludzi jak najbardziej jest OK

ale jestem gotów się założyć że typowy Niemiec, nawet taki będący w Wrocławiu takiej nazwy nie użyje w odniesieniu do takiego obiektu

note that we cannot use w3w identifiers, see osm.wiki/What3words

> This has to be resolved.

it may require data consumer starting to support also genus tags (maybe also taxon?)

node/6060490877/history has stone_type = khachkar that was added in this edit
What is here? Boulder with carved khachkar ?

In such case stone_type=khachkar makes sense and should not be marked as deprecated

Or it is it a carved slab? In such case memorial=stele + stele=khachkar would be a better tagging

Hello! node/6060490877/history has stone_type = khachkar that was added in this edit
What is here? Boulder with carved khachkar ?

In such case stone_type=khachkar makes sense and should not be marked as deprecated

Or it is it a carved slab? In such case memorial=stele + stele=khachkar would be a better tagging

Hello! node/11362676797/history has stone_type = khachkar that was added in this edit
What is here? Boulder with carved khachkar ?

In such case stone_type=khachkar makes sense and should not be marked as deprecated

Or it is it a carved slab? In such case memorial=stele + stele=khachkar would be a better tagging