OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175127594

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127594

175127605

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127605

175128030

"overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175128030

175128365

"City pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175128365

173107234

Hello.
In general in OSM it's better to try to edit an existing feature to its current state rather than delete a feature and create a new one.
Editing an existing feature preserves history of that object, if there's ever a need to refer to it in the future. Doing delete/create loses that history.
In this specific case it's not so critical since that object didn't have any other edits, but in the future please try to avoid delete/create.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173107234

174842508

Good job👍🙂I added a couple more tags to cams, gantry and pole and adjusted the position of the street itself to be closer to the middle of the actal roadbed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174842508

174751420

My apologies about duplicate messages. It looked like they originally didn't send.

You could separately map that pole and gantry and then attach cameras to that gantry. But if that's too much for now, that's alright too. 😅

174754156

Hello.
This edit has a similar issue as your other edits. You attached camera to the perimeter of a parking lot.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174754156

174754156

Hello.
This edit has a similar issue as your other edits. You attached camera to the perimeter of a parking lot.

174751431

Hello.
This edit has the same issue as the previous one. Please disconnect camera from crosswalk

174751420

Hello.
In this edit you attached this camera to a crosswalk path. Semantically this doesn't seem correct.. I highly doubt that a camera is part of the crosswalk itself.
Please disconnect these 2 features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174751420

174751420

Hello.
In this edit you attached this camera to a crosswalk path. Semantically this doesn't seem correct.. I highly doubt that a camera is part of the crosswalk itself.
Please disconnect these 2 features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174751420

174751420

Hello.
In this edit you attached this camera to a crosswalk path. Semantically this doesn't seem correct.. I highly doubt that a camera is part of the crosswalk itself.
Please disconnect these 2 features.

174631409

Changeset reverted due to dragged node.

changeset/174700535

149784063

Hello. I wasn't the one that performed the revert, so I don't know if all the street names have been restored.
Regarding your workflow, if could consider using https://mapcomplete.org, since it have single-task-sort-of editing modes... Or just get more practice with iD 😉

149784063

Hello. You deleted names from many streets. Why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149784063

157308968

Hello.
Is the way/226933484 exclusively for bikes now or is it a street+bike lane?

165142446

Hello.
This source: pdf does not mention this camera. What is the source of your information?

166039176

Looking at some of the local photos, it does look like those kerbs are "lowered" on all the nodes that you edited here. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176

166039176

Regarding crossing island, I was referring to node/12823905500
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176