Hallo, die Änderungen die du hier gemacht hast scheinen alle falsch zu sein, auf diesen Strassen war der Zugang für Motorfarhrzeuge schon auf den Zubringerdienst beschränkt alles andere ist falsch.

@Mashin while I can understand your sentiment, there is so much wrong with the import that it will be less work, including for the importer to redo it properly if it is even desired. In particular the overlapping data makes no sense at all to try and clean up "manually".

Hi, you seem to have added "lots" of data on top of the existing data in these changesets. Was this import discussed in any form with the community before? It is definitely technically defective.

Forgot to mention that the impetus for the edit was a note that pointed out that the pitch isn't a parking lot.

Hi, it is not clear if you actually wanted to add something here. If yes, please explain what you wanted to do.

Thanks

Hi, you seem to be deleting a very large number of building polygons in your recent changesets. Could you give some more information than just "Polygon Deleted" on why you are doing this?

Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Danke für das fleissige Mappen.

Du hast bei den letzten paar Edits keinen richtigen Kommentar angegeben, es ist wirklich hilfreich, auch wenn manchmal repetitiv, wenn der Kommentar einen Hinweis auf die Änderungen beinhaltet. Siehe auch osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Einfach in online Editor ("iD"), nachdem das Objekt angewählt wurde, links im Objekttyp anwählen und im Suchfeld einen entsprechenden Begriff eingeben, Z.B. Blumen, dann sollten die passenden Vorlagen angezeigt werden.

Den Punkt in changeset/117764160 entfernt.

Hallo ritualis

Was wolltest du mit deiner Änderung denn bewirken? Du hast hier nur einen Punkt mit einem Namen hinzugefügt aber kein eigentliches Objekt (der HB St. Gallen liegt ja auch nicht da).

Gruss

@Mathias Haugsbø that is clearly wrong. The name tag is only for facilities that commonly have a name and clearly not for ATMs, vending machines and, charging stations (all for which the NSI mistakenly suggests name tags).

I noticed that the multi-polygon besides being incredibly large had nodes as outer elements https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/13671879/1 could you explain how you did that?

Partially undone in changeset/115525178

Partiality undone in changeset/115524916#map=12/46.4007/9.7533

Partially undone in changeset/115524460#map=12/46.4671/9.8539

Hi, I've reverted some of the changes you made here because they run counter to what we agreed to do when we imported the municipality boundaries from swisstopo and have maintained during, the now many years of maintenance. See changeset/115523976#map=12/46.3616/9.6205 (note that the official name of the municipality is just Bregaglia according to the BFS).

I believe you made similar changes to a couple of other places that I'll be undoing too.

Hallo

Da bist du aber hier node/35966219#map=19/50.11004/8.59431 wohl etwas verrutscht.

osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Das war, sagen wir mal "suboptimal". Bitte das nächste mal bevor du grossflächig etwas änderst, zuerst nachforschen/fragen. Siehe auch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2021-November/011335.html

Hi, naturally improving the data is welcome, the problem here is that you deleted wholesale the original elements and lost both the history and details that had been previously added. The other issue is that before using a 3rd party data source we need to determine is we are allowed to do so, which in this case didn't happen. But as said above discussing how to proceed would be better suited to the Swiss mailing list.