SimonPoole's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 45448836 | highway=path is a legit tag do not change to footway just for pokemon go |
|
| 45448956 | Reverted in changeset/45492367#map=19/47.40075/8.40174
|
|
| 45449007 | Reverted in changeset/45492249 |
|
| 45449088 | Reverted in changeset/45492170#map=17/47.40503/8.38749 |
|
| 45449271 | Footways are always accessible by foot. |
|
| 45488598 | Note the revert here actually did the wrong thing, the previous tagging was wrong and should have actually been water_park, but the edit added a leisure_1=park which was wrong, the area is now tagged as a water_park. |
|
| 45449294 | Removed non existant footway |
|
| 45449350 | Reverted in changeset/45491497
|
|
| 45449472 | Looks OK |
|
| 45449715 | Note ways in the forest that are wide enough for two track vehicles should be tagged as tracks, the changes near Holzmatt are probably not correct. |
|
| 45482407 | Likely OK |
|
| 45482472 | Footways or landuse seem to be a bit misaligned but otherwise OK |
|
| 45482547 | Reverted in changeset/45491105 none of the extra tags were necessary. |
|
| 45482749 | Reverted in changeset/45491012 note: addind school=yes to an amenity school does not make any sense. |
|
| 45483609 | This is OK |
|
| 45483731 | This is OK, not really needed on the pedestrian area around the church though. |
|
| 45484039 | The footway is OK. |
|
| 45484146 | These are not public footpaths and a bit borderline as such, but can stay. |
|
| 45484164 | This OK, note that access=yes is the default. |
|
| 45484326 | Reverted in changeset/45490650 (Bühlstrasse is definitely not a footway) |