SimonPoole's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 58099014 | Thank you for stopping the import. Could you explain what the objects are supposed to be? Some of them seem to coincide with "Points fixes planimétriques" and would seem to be potentially useful, if they contained information about where they are (so that they could be identified on imagery), others not. Naturally in any case as already mentioned the import process should be followed.
|
|
| 58099014 | Please stop this import immediately. Any non-trivial import has to follow osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines and this does not on a number of counts. |
|
| 57846896 | Ich habe die 0 wieder entfernt, da weder der ursprüngliche Datensatz noch der aktuelle Gebrauch des BfS führende 0 hat (siehe z.B. osm.wiki/w/images/d/dd/Be-d-00.04-aag-01-20171024.pdf) und wenn man das ändern möchte man ziemlich viele Gemeindegrenzen anfassen müsste. |
|
| 57916298 | This was a revert of an unintended upload. |
|
| 57669002 | Es gibt im Augenblick noch keine wirklich gute Lösung für Ortsteile die nicht administrative Einheiten sind (sprich flächige place Objekte haben diverse Problem die lösbar aber nicht gelöst sind). Gruss |
|
| 57669002 | Hallo, was hast du genau in diesem Changeset gemacht? Es gibt in der Schweiz im allgemeinen (Quartiere in Grossstädten ausgenommen), keine administrativen Einheiten mit Level 10 und ehemalige Gemeinden werden, wenn auch als Orte noch vorhanden, auch offiziell (siehe swisstopo) nicht mit den alten Gemeindegrenzen weitergeführt. Wenn du die alte Grenze nicht löschen willst dann bitte als boundary=historic weiterführen. Danke |
|
| 28837514 | Danke :-) |
|
| 28837514 | Hallo S-S, eine Frage: in diesem Changeset hast du motor_vehicle=no gesetzt, was doch sehr unwahrscheinlich scheint, ist das nicht eher motor_vehicle=destination? |
|
| 56648956 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648163 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648150 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648131 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648115 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648094 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648085 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648069 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648040 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648023 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56648014 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|
|
| 56647996 | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing.
|