Hi, you are still modifying building geometries based on inferior data, that is using aerial imagery instead of the building outline layer that is available. Again: please stop doing that, if you need help with using the correct background please ask (as it should be rare that I building wasn't already correct you should not be modifying the geometries without double checking).

Besides stopping breaking already very good positioning and outlines, could you please add meaningful changeset comments to your edits instead of trying to be original.

Note no imagery was actually used in this edit.

This was an unintended upload, reverted in changeset/75764185

I would replace it with tagging (sidewalk=left).

I have noticed a further issue there, the pavement / footway / sidewalk along the left hand side of the road is missing a lot of connections to roads and paths branching off Balscadden Road making it as is practically unusable for routing.

Works for the OSRM instance now, graphhopper doesn't seem to have updated yet.

Probably needs a full 24 hours before we panic :-).

Hallo, der Weg way/729898111 hat jetzt keine "Hauptattribute" mehr. Vermutlich sollte das wieder highway=track werden, Fahrverbote oder Einschränkungen sollten mit

vehicle=private

oder

motor_vehicle=private

eingetragen werden.

IIRC C&P was playing up when I wanted to add the comment so I typed the id manually and switched 56 to 65. Sorry.

Reverted in changeset/74343113

See changeset/74265100#map=18/-37.60208/143.86766

With other words completely false alarm.

This was not actually reverted (which can be seen from the object history), simply a typo when adding the comment.

Do you have a changeset id for that? As far as I can see it is not one of the five reverted from above from Loengrin200010

Asking to revert the changsets? See source tag.

Reverted in changeset/74343113

Reverted in changeset/74343113

Reverted in changeset/74343113

Reverted in changeset/74343113

Reverted in changeset/74343113