Zdravim, aky ma zmysel pridavat sposoby platby na cele obchodne centrum? Snad kazdy obchod moze prijimat ine sposoby platby.

Budova v budove? Neviem aky zmysel mala tato zmena. Myslim, ze predosly stav bol spravnejsi.

Zdravim, prosim nedavajte brany na chodnik, ktory len ide okolo brany/arealu a cez branu neprechadza. Vasim sposobom sme zablokovali aj chodnik (pre navigaciu).
Branu dajte na spolocny bod plotu okolo arealu a cestu, ktora smeruje do arealu (a musi cez branu prejst). Dakujem

Opravene.
Henten Človek, dakujeme za zistenie a zakreslenie vsetkych tych obchodov. Upresnujeme Vam tu len par technickych detailov ako sa to ma spravnejsie robit.

Klerik7, na chodniky s 'indoor' sa prave 'layer' dava, ked sa krizuju, ale su na roznych poschodiach. A to na ktorych poschodiach, to sa vyjadri cez 'level'. Casto mozu byt layer a level s rovnakou hodnotou, ale maju byt obe, maju odlisny vyznam.

Veru, toto cele OC MAX je nejaky experiment. Prekryvajuce sa budovy a akesi oblasti s indoor=yes a preto maju layer.

Na obchodoch pouziva layer, zrejme na vyjadrenie poschodia, ale na to sa ma pouzit 'level'.

No skusim to upratat.

Why? What college is this?
the whole university was already mapped as way/357005956 . Is this a department of the university? If so, which one?

Davajte pozor, SPU je uz davno zakreslena ako way/357005956 .

Yes, and? Presence of cyclists there does not mean it is allowed. That dyke is very problematic and bikers crash with pedestrians therefore the rules were changed a few times and cyclists rerouted. We need to find out what the legal situation is today. And even if bicycles would be allowed (tolerated) there, it does not mean it is primarily a cycleway as there is a better one parallel to it (west of the canal).

Zdravim, preco zmena detskeho dopravneho ihriska na cesty unclassified (pre auta) ? Myslim, ze footway bolo dobre, je to chodnik pre pesie deti a pripadne deti na bicykloch (ale nie beznu cyklisticku verejnost).

Yes, if it is even a cycleway. But there is a cycleway west of here to the left to the canal (like way/207914519). So it is unclear whether the segments you changed even are cycleways. All the cycleroutes run on the cycleway left of the canal. So we need to find out what the real traffic sign is on the segments you touched.

Also, when you played at the "K-configuration" you forgot to reduce the number of lanes after the service road branched off. I fixed it with way/1444024728 . Pay more attention next time, or you will do much damage when fixing roads all over the world.

Hi, why is oneway tag wrong on roundabouts?

Aha, zda sa, ze on ho postavil: https://nitra.dnes24.sk/opravuju-mariansky-stlp-na-svatoplukovom-namesti-prace-budu-stat-vyse-5-tisic-eur-275116

To som pisal ja. Ale zaujimam sa preco ste vymazali prave ten objekt z dvoch, ktory vyzeral lepsie spracovany. Je to tento stlp:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Nitra_-_Mari%C3%A1nsky_st%C4%BAp_-_Sv%C3%A4toplukovo_n%C3%A1m.jpg ?

Co znamena to menu biskupa na objekte v OSM?

Zdravim, dodnes ste neodpovedali. Okrem toho maju cyklisti takmer po celej dlzke hradze od Petrzalky po Cunovo paralelnu cestu zapadne. Takze preco by mali jazdit aj po hradzi. Aka je tam dopravna znacka?

Rozumiem.
Neviem ako to naozaj je, tak to zasadne menit nebudem. Cyklotrasa tadial vedie, ale to nie je vzdy smerodajne. Mam tam otvorenu poznamku, nech to niekto preveri.

Hm, vymazali ste node/722129508/history ? Ten mal ale viac zaujimavych vlastnosti, ako ten bod co zostal. Ako to tam presne vyzera?

Hi, thanks for the attempts to add some objects along the EV6.
However, there are many problem:
It does not make sense to have bench,table and site on the same node node/13250023818 .

Why is node node/13250023819 needed? Why do you touch country borders?

Why do you think bicycles are allowed at way/1116848141 or way/239014891 ?

The change to footway way/432951898 is wrong, it is parallel to the pedestrian zone, but separated, not what you have done.

way/1443955897 is unneeded. It overlaps the edge of pedestrian zone way/12329451 which does have bicycles allowed.

Why is bicycle=yes needed on way/92387596 ? There is a bicycle crossing nearby at way/681001508 .

node/12925875150 don't change parcel_lockers randomly.

way/1443955905 why is this layer=-1 ? If it is a passage through a building, it does not need layer (it is on the same layer as the building).

I cannot comment on the changes in Hungary, but most of the changes in Slovakia seem wrong or at least dubious. So please answer and explain properly.

Well, way/662224411 was marked as cycleway, so bicycle=yes is somehow implicit, it did not need to be added. But why bicycle=yes on way/5027814 ? What is the traffic sign there?