Sorry, that is no explanation. There is no rule the tags need to be on a node, not an area.
See e.g. osm.wiki/Railway_stations#Overview .

Tak som to teda zaktualizoval podla tych stranok, aj so zeleznicou v budove.
Dakujem za informacie.

Veru, asi zatial nie je.
Zda sa, ze ludia nieco pouzivaju, zatial bez wiki stranky:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/attraction=model_railway#overview

Dakujem. Podla zaslanej fotky ide o modelovy vlacik, co ludi urcite nevozi.

"Miniature railways are distinct from model railways which have a track width less than 2.5" (64mm) and don't carry passengers. "

Zdravim, naozaj je to vlak, co vozi ludi? railway=miniature
Okrem toho sa zda, ze minimalne v severovychodnej casti ten tvar nezodpoveda Ortofoto.

Jasne, aj nazov kniznice vidite na Ortofoto...
https://halic.biblib.sk/

Ved to sa pytam, ktoru cast Horsky park nesplna. Nabuduce prosim presnejsi odkaz.
Tak to teda dajme prec.

Zial ESRI ma na roznych zoomoch rozne stare fotky. Moze to mylit.

No neviem, nie je je to les fungujuci ako park (lesopark)? Mame tam znacenie aj natural=wood, aj leisure park, park pokryty lesom. Ale ak sa odvolavate na to, ze v parku ma byt zelen upravovana ako spominaju na wiki (managed, controlled), tak o tom by sa dalo uvazovat.

Zdravim, co povazujete za novsie zabery? Praveze na novsich (ESRI) sa nachadza. Na Ortofotomozaike nie, ale ta je stara z 2023.

Hi, please write your sources next time, thanks.

Thanks for the additions. But when you separated turning lanes into separate roads on junction of R2 and 16 (correct, as there are islands), you have to update the 'lanes' and "turn:lanes" and also all the *:forward *:backward tags so that they match the new situation. After your change the tags are wrong and misleading causing wrong routing or navigation instructions.
You just split existing roads but did not update the tags so many now-invalid ones remained.

You also forgot to add turning restrictions as now from some of the branches it is not possible to turn into any direction (like left and right). Also you split the roads too soon, when there is still possible to change lanes (there is no physical barrier between the lanes), see the examples at lanes=* and osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement .

I have fixed it after you (see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178546094 ) and please do these junctions properly if you are doing this all over the world and in such quantities.

Zdravim, je zastavka node/9641488744 rovnaka ako node/3439000745 ? A to iste na druhej strane cesty.

it is now in bus relation...

Good catch. It is not in bus relation, it is used.

No veru, bol som to pozriet a je to dost inak ako v OSM, ulica je spojena a pomedzi stlpiky sa da prejst napr. bicyklom. Ani tam uz nie je zakaz vjazdu mot.vozidiel okrem zasobovanie. Opravil som.

Thanks, but you didn't need to remove the old names of the cafe.

Dobre, ale naozaj su tam dva rady stlpikov, kolme na cestu a medzi nimi medzera s nejakou prekazkou, cez ktoru sa neda prejst? Ked tie dve casti Satinskeho nie su spojene (v jednom bode so stlpikom).

Zdravim, naco je toto dobre? Preco relacia v relacii? Je potrebnych tolko urovni, ked maju len jedneho clena?
A preco maju oba useky (BA-Rajka a BA-Wolfsthal) rovnakeho clena?

Tiez by mozno nezaskodilo do tych jednotlivych relacii pridat znacku stage (stage=*) aby sa ujasnilo poradie.

Hi, please do not change shapes of buildings marked source=kapor2 as those are from the Slovak cadastre, unless you use the cadastre map and you see the building has changed. You do not qoute this source. Some building parts cannot be seen properly on Ortofotomozaika SR.

Also the swimming_pools do not need an area=yes tag. But they are all private so should have been tagged access=private and swimming_pool=personal. Without these tags, this is just a giant heap of public pools.