OpenStreetMap
ralley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 155976483 | Review as requested: Adding the building for the store looks good but the store is now mapped as both a node and a polygon (the building). The node shpould instead be replaced by the building so that the principle of "one feature, one OSM element" is followed: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
|
|
| 154252618 | You have changed the name of Clarence Street West to Calrence Street yet as seen in this June 2024 imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.8288956&lng=174.7928306&z=17&pKey=1655430748603131&focus=photo&x=0.6564028295139888&y=0.3780451361608255&zoom=1.1264080100125153). The signposted name includes "West", can you please advise what your source for this change was? |
|
| 148791850 | This change also dragged the address node for 25 Hugh Green Drive. (node/5513377408). Fixed. |
|
| 134750030 | You have changed way/102297848 from a building to a park which appears from aerial imagery to be wrong, was this deliberate?
|
|
| 134515853 | Thanks for adding the driveway but once again you have added a made up name. As per osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag is for genuine names only.
|
|
| 57280475 | Not intentional, fixed |
|
| 128750531 | As per comments on changeset/128320877 to which you did not reply again you have performed a mass deletion of precisely mapped residential areas.
|
|
| 128018642 | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, looks good except please don't use the name field for generic names like "house" it is reserved for proer names only osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things. In this case replacing building=yes with building=house would be appropriate building=house
|
|
| 86095890 | Abovencomment wrongly made to V3 instead of V4
|
|
| 127023930 | Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
|
|
| 86095890 | Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
|
|
| 125385141 | Please do not use the name tag to mark life cycle stages - it is for proper names only. Please see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead
|
|
| 124880453 | Instead of adding POI's you edited existing suburb entries and changed them from suburbs to places of worship, this is not the correct way to edit
|
|
| 124663902 | Your edit has resulted in overlapping buildings. Is the building itself really named "Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd" or is this merely one of the businesses contained within?
|
|
| 124702925 | Your description mentions yellow pages but you seem to have added no applicable tags, I would expect a name= and something like office= based on the description
|
|
| 124332042 | Thanks for the edits. One thing, please use ITU format for phone numbers: phone=*#Usage I've corrected this one. |
|
| 124322224 | Please don't edit the name to include the branch details, instead the branch should be put in a separate branch tag: branch=*
|
|
| 124322224 | Please don't edit the name to include the branch details, instead the branch should be put in a separate branch tag: branch=*
|
|
| 123581257 | Would this not be better tagged as amenity=clinic instead of amenity=hospital?
|
|
| 122658537 | It appears as if you are making changes made my local editors with local knowledge based on outdated LINZ aerial imagery. The Innovation Complex construction (way/226696411) that you have deleted was added in 2021 by a local mapper and matches the latest Maxar Imagery. You have also added a non-existant walkway (local knowedge) and tagged an entire car park as consisting of disabled spaces. Multiple NZ changesets of yours have been commented on with no response. Please respond.
|