Do you have a dataset of the cemetery names you are using? Just curious where they're coming from

Hi jbl0, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for helping to update the area post-Helene; certainly a lot has changed.

A few notes for these changes:
- the 'name' tag is used for waterways that have actual names, not just descriptive data. Thus the East Fork New River has a name, but tributaries (there are many) of it are not named 'Tributary of ...'
- The 'tunnel=flooded' tag is used for actual tunnels which carry water. For mapping flood damage from events, we can use the 'damage' or 'hazard' tags.
- The boundary you adjusted is not an actual property boundary, but just an approximation of the woods behind the houses. OSM does not map legal property boundaries or parcels; locally that data are managed by the Watauga County GIS office. So unless the property owner has felled numerous trees to make room for the well house, this data should stay.

I've updated the data to be in line with correct tagging, but thank you for fixing the stream! A lot of waterways have shifted course since the flooding. You can see my changes at changeset/157984492

Well if all public streets are residential roads, then I suppose Linney St can be a residential road.

I was parked on Linney St yesterday. The only thing accessible from it is the PO. I'm not sure what the rest of that means; highway=service does not require private access.

Why did you change way/18905145 to residential? It is actually literally a service road, providing one lane of traffic solely for the post office.

Why did you delete the construction area, or is it opened? It was still an active construction site when I drove past a couple days ago.

Beat me to it!

This change seems to be entirely in contradiction to the goal of that MR challenge. These roads are exclusively for golf carts.

Hi,
Please use more descriptive changesets besides "Tracing" for everything. It's not possible to determine what you're actually editing without digging into every single changeset.

Thanks.

Can you please respond to any these comments? This still appears to be a large undiscussed import, and I'm seeing an increase in edits from your app using the newly-invented tag.

Also please respond to the concerns about your app I mentioned on changeset/149276901

Surely we have something newer than 2012? Over a decade old?

Oh wait a lil web search has revealed https://data-brunsco.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/cf2511356239494eb64f89d9aadc8ddc_0/about

This import also does not seem to follow any of the requires import guidelines osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi awohl, can you please respond to the concerns outlined at osm.wiki/Talk:Key:foot_traffic ? Your tag does not seem to be verifiable or quantifiable for mappers, and did not follow the tagging proposal process or receive any input from the community.

Can you elaborate what you mean by "2 track added"? No features were added here, and no tracks were touched at all.

Where did way/1265676282 come from? It looks like a classic ancient TIGER powerline except it is entirely new from this changeset. It doesn't exist on any imagery I have.

Most of these crossing were incorrectly edited, specifically the ones that are actual crossings on roads and not just parking lot entrances....

The Hellbender Bar node looks fine but the New Public House node (this changeset) doesn't have any descriptive tags, but has a wheelchair tag.

I haven't been there in a while so your survey is authoritative, but from their website it appears to still be operating.

If it's no longer a hotel, what is it? Appears to still serve food according to the website.

Hi BarnesMe, are you editing on behalf of the NC DOT? If so, please make sure to follow the guidelines for organized editing https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Hi __zach__, are you editing on behalf of the NC DOT? If so, please make sure to follow the guidelines for organized editing https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines