Hi, are you sure way/464064530 really exists (or existed)? I passed there today, and I recall only a left and a right track after passing the ford. However, my gps trace is just in between the two current tracks (way/464064530 and way/45492747 ), so maybe these are two lines representing one physical track?

OK, thanks!

Hi, wrt. this changeSet, I cannot find back references to "les Heids" (node/4514052116) . I did find some references to the abandoned village of "Marchimont". Is les Heids the same as Marchimont?

Thanks, was just about to add a note about this one, passed here today and noted indeed "la vire" and the white-blue-white markings!

Reported this edit.

I don't know this viewpoint, and I can't see how it would be accessed. Could you point me to your source of information for adding this viewpoint to the map? Thanks

Could it be that the singletrack is gone again?

FYI: I added note/2048527 to the map

Thanks! While you are there, could you also have a look if way/553071342 really/still exists (at least according to the strava heatmap, not many people pass there).

Hi, I couldn't find way/564449250#map=18/50.75478/4.63933 back today. Maybe somebody from the neighbourhood should cross-check if it still exists?

Hi ghia,
It seems like way/83490519 was 'taken back' by a farmer? At least the path was completely invisible today...

Reverted in changeset/77185328#map=15/50.7454/4.6511

Again, cfr. the discussion at changeset/73813177#map=15/50.7474/4.6513 . There is a clear path here. Yes, from time to time you have to step over a fallen tree. But there are tags to indicate this (such as smoothness=* ). Removing the way is not the appropriate action, so please refrain from deleting this path once more.

I can confirm that the paths still exist (and are accessible), passed here today

thx for the info!

Hi, is way/612822178 really a different path from the paths that were already in place?

Zou dit een betere keuze kunnen zijn?

natural=gully

Dag Koen,
Is er echt/duidelijk sprake van een pad hier, of gaat het gewoon over de (met een informatiebordje aangeduide kloven)? Ik had altijd (misschien verkeerdelijk) de indruk dat er geen echt pad loopt, en dat het niet de bedoeling was/niet toegelaten was om in die kloven te gaan (aan de andere kant, ik kan me ook geen expliciet 'verbod' herinneren)

You shouldn't take any further action indeed. In your pic, I can still somewhat recognise the single track, but indeed, it is much more clear now

"Reverted" as of changeset/53161650