Rail Trails and railway=abandoned
Posted by Natfoot on 8 March 2026 in English. Last updated on 9 March 2026.Rail trails with route relations with railway=abandoned to denote a rail trail is not working. When the named “bike route” enters city streets or along side walks where the railroad never went this becomes and tagging nightmare.
I have had to remove railway=abandoned from a route relation in British Columbia and in New Hampshire where these were both issues. osm.org/note/5066887#map=15/41.40203/-73.62096
osm.org/note/4680502#map=15/49.49511/-121.22581
Can we find a better tags to mark bike routes with rail trail?
this is specific to route relations and not current tags for infrastructure, railway=abandoned still works for infrastructure
I would propose something like railway=trail so we keep this straight. It looks like railtrail=yes is a tag.
Yours in Mapping Natfoot
this is related to my other project on routing and bike routes. ask if you want to know more.
Discussion
Comment from Mammi71 on 15 March 2026 at 18:59
You can read:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/loschung-von-alten-bahnlinien/129177/681
e.g. about usage of railtrail=yes
An about a similar project https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/karte-der-bahntrassenradwege/125706/317
Mammi71