Relation roles corrected

Relation roles corrected

Roles in relation/15980981 corrected.

HI
The roles in relation/20304766 are incorrect..

The outside has been given the role 'inner' and the inside has been given the role 'outer'.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=178.16222&lat=-38.47227&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
What feature is relation Rotorua Central Mall (20086689), v1 trying to map?

An indoor corridor?
A building?
A shop?

It is tagged for all 3 ...

I think it should be mapping the shop=mall as

Each building has a separate way .. and they are separate buildings? So tag the separate ways as such .. this enables each to have different heights, colours, materials roofs etc.

The corridor would not take all of the internal space.

Next problem: there are shared segments between outer ways... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=176.25138&lat=-38.14068&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Simply create a new way that incorporates all of these buildings and put that way into the mall relation.

Good .. that fixed the razed bit for the Syd 2 Melb XPT.

Niggle .. the ways were not in sequential order .. I fix that for the Syd 2 Melb XPT.
You may want to check the others? I use to find problems:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=144.94284&lat=-37.80718&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Hi,
relation/20321527 ... first a one member multipolygon relation is data bloat - just put the tag/s on the way and delete the relation.
However in this case it is an error - the outer has not been added... so I have done that and transferred the tags from the outer way to the relation.

And where does the Sydney to Melbourne XPT route 19744551 now run???
Was on Way: North Eastern Standard Gauge Line (135649140), Way: ARTC Standard Gauge Line (961587018) and Way: ARTC Standard Gauge Line (1484485186)

Further
the multipoluygon should not share segments on the outer ways.

In this case I have deleted the relation . Combined the 2 ways into one way and placed the tags on that way.

Hi
A multipolygon members should have 'roles' .. in this case 'outers'/
The tags on the multipolygon should no repeat the tags on the ways.

Relation deleted - shared segments, no roles
Made simple way that includes surrounds and tagged that as community centre (no building tag as those are on the actual buildings)

Changeset comment should be
Resolve 'Moore Guy' from relation into simple way.
Source - OSMInspector, OSM, bing

Hi,
Why have you marked Charters Towers Aerodrome as military?
It was constructed for military purposes .. but now?
Looks like it is controlled by hte local council - they collect landing fees & charges...
https://www.charterstowers.qld.gov.au/Services/Facilities-and-services/Airports-airstrips

Hi,
Issue with Relation: Bingera Conservation Park 1 (1506713)...

This looks to be a gliders airfield - North Gregory/Elliott Field https://www.pilotnav.com/airport/YETT

Primarily used by https://gliding.inbundy.com.au/gliding/

Maybe it is 'used ' for both ???

----------- I have also raised this on changeset/106895639

Hi,
Issue with Relation: Bingera Conservation Park 1 (1506713)...

This looks to be a gliders airfield - North Gregory/Elliott Field https://www.pilotnav.com/airport/YETT

Primarily used by https://gliding.inbundy.com.au/gliding/

Maybe it is 'used ' for both ???

Changeset comment should be
Add Caboolture Gliding Club. Add some buildings, fences. Expand parking from node to area.

The relation for the Smallwood Estate is not how it was originally mapped. I like this one better. But as a 1 member relation it can be simplified - put the relationship tags on the way and delete the relation.

Hi,
Should not the interval be on the ferry route relations not on the individual segments? Some segments are used by different routes.. thus could be confusing???

Yay!
Looks like it complies with 'the rules'.

14 days
no response.