OpenStreetMap
fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 180072462 | Hi, can you please use a more descriptive changeset description than just "improvements"? osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some more information
|
|
| 179963939 | Hi, the farmland landuses you've drawn don't match up to the actual farmland boundaries, and the house is both traced wrong and has way too many nodes.
|
|
| 179701792 | Hi, these two roads should be joined up as this is a petrol station, the building in between them is just a roof.
|
|
| 179750926 | Hi, the roadway doesn't curve in the way you've shown, can you please redraw this to show the actual roadway and not a turn into a specific property.
|
|
| 179761311 | Hi, what imagery did you use for this, since ESRI shows a former carpark now under construction, and Bing doesn't line up with what you've drawn?
|
|
| 179284064 | Hi, there appears to be barriers going across sections of roadways you've drawn, it might be best to confirm with street level imagery or with better quality aerial imagery.
|
|
| 179199491 | Revert edit made with outdated imagery to restore the roundabout that now exists |
|
| 179199491 | I've confirmed that the ESRI imagery is 2025 whereas Bing is 2020, so I'll reverted this to restore the roundabout. |
|
| 179199491 | Hi, ESRI shows that this is actually a roundabout. Usually that is newer than Bing, have you been here and confirmed there isn't a roundabout? Otherwise, this should probably be reverted back to the roundabout.
|
|
| 179110148 | They're not needed in Australia, as we have full mapping of those as relations and those are used when geocoding.
|
|
| 179106110 | Hi, building=detached has about 8x more usage than house=detached in Australia, it's probably better to stick with that vs building=house and house=detached.
|
|
| 179041147 | Hi, I don't think this would be considered a pipestem, it looks to just be a single rural property.
|
|
| 178970917 | Hi, the path normally should extend to the roadway (and be joined to the way for that roadway) if they do join up through a kerb.
|
|
| 178763845 | Hi Jaroro, the format for phone numbers should be +61 421 024 435 for mobile numbers, and +61 8 8323 7594 for landlines.
|
|
| 178662718 | Hi, highway=path is more generic than highway=footway. If something is designed mostly for foot traffic but bicycles are still allowed, it should be kept as highway=footway and then bicycle=yes added to it.
|
|
| 178433769 | Hi, if the greens and other objects are inside the fairway, they should ideally be drawn as a multipolygon, otherwise you're actually drawing those areas as being both greens/bunkers and fairway at the same time.
|
|
| 178384855 | Hi, your address on your website doesn't match this location. It also appears to be a residential location, is this an office where someone can come to at any time between 8am and 10pm Monday to Sunday?
|
|
| 178366608 | Hi, ESRI imagery shows this driveway going through a building, can you please align it correctly?
|
|
| 178334743 | Hi, this is still incorrect, you can see where the road deviates from what you've drawn, can you please correct this. The road is visible enough through the trees to draw this accurately.
|
|
| 178304362 | Hi, you've also changed way/193087873 to be access=no, was this intentional, considering there are houses along here?
|