Ok, ein Blick auf die erstellen Notes des Users beantwortet dann mehrere Fragen: @MHBFDEU/notes

Hallo,

ich habe einmal lokalen Mapper über das folgende Changeset hierher eingeladen: changeset/170409470

Die gelöschten Wege hatten bei meinen Stichproben durchaus ein gutes Tagging. Auch auf den ersten Blick bei den Satellitenbildern scheint das direkte Löschen der Wege hier etwas seltsam ...

Hi Tommy Tokoto,

bitte schau einmal bei dem Folgenden Changeset vorbei: changeset/179268128

Dort wurden Änderungen durchgeführt, die auch dieses Changeset hier betreffen.

Danke und viele Grüße,
Pascal

For clarification: I am not a member of the Data Working Group (DWG), and I do not have the ability to hide or delete notes.

Hi Rafał Plewa,

Due to the recent messages I have received from you and their content, I have referred this matter to the DWG for review.

I consider the tone and wording of your messages inappropriate and not in line with respectful community communication.

I will refrain from further public discussion and await their response.

Danke @Luzandro

Fixed by
changeset/179201641
changeset/179201641

In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

👍

Thank you for the clarification.

Please ensure the location is clearly verifiable on the ground (e.g., permanent signage) and tag it accordingly as an embarkation/meeting point if there is no office or shop present. If applicable, you may also add available payment methods.

Thanks.

PS: Could you please clarify where the company is physically based? The current node is located directly on a dock in the harbor. Is there an actual office or shop at this location?

PS: The bot's concern only relates to the description text, which was/is still spammy.

You did it already @Manos Roudas

See changeset/179164832

Hello,

Thank you for your reply.

To clarify, the issue is *not* the company name.

The concern only relates to the description text, which should be factual, concise, and non-promotional. OpenStreetMap is a neutral map database and does not allow marketing-style wording.

Please revise the description accordingly.

Thank you!

Thanks @Timmy_Tesseract

changeset/179158815

Spam

Spam

Thank you for clarifying.

Best regards,
On behalf of the NeisBot

Thanks @silversurfer83

Reverted by changeset/179140997

I used at least the wiki-page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andorra_la_Vella

Please stop!