Hi! Because I'm using StreetComplete, and it has a quest asking whether trees are broadleaved or needleleaved, I see a lot of your work on my surveys. Apart from the question how useful it is to map trees in a park, I noticed that there are a lot of inaccuracies in your mapping: many times trees are in the wrong place, not all trees are mapped, sometimes what looks like one tree on areal images are really several trees, and sometimes what looks like a tree is better mapped as natural=shrub. Very often when SC asks me if a tree is needle-leaved or broadleaved, I can't determine which tree I should look at. So please consider when mapping trees if you are not introducing many errors on the map... not mapping something is better than mapping it wrong, I think. Maybe just tagging an area as leisure=park is often the best option?

That's a long time ago! I think I set the access to private because I thought the roads and tracks are in a national park where motor vehicles are prohibited unless they have permission. I see that even Google Streetview has been there (all the way to h. Dermenka) so maybe I was wrong. If you think it's wrong, please change it.

Are you sure the sports pitch on the roof is for football (soccer)? From the street I could see that there are nets to catch balls, but not for what kind of sport it is made. Could it be for tennis, volleyball, etc.?

It's best to use an average of many GPS tracks, for example from Strava. See osm.wiki/Strava

Thanks for improving the paths there! How did you determine where they are? It looks like you used a GPS track? Please note that there is some noise in GPS signals, so they are usually not as reliable as they seem. This way way/635975518 for instance, is probably not as curvy as you mapped it. I think it's quite straight, as it was mapped before. I often walk that path

Hi, thanks for your contribution! However another playground is already mapped very close to the one you added, so I assumed it's a duplicate and deleted yours again. I also assume its name is not "Детска площадка"?

I think it's a very bad idea to place tags for a hotel and a bar on the same node. Are the opening hours you added valid for the bar, the hotel, or both? Which phone nr. is for the hotel, and which for the bar? I recommend that you revert your edits.

Is it completely closed for everybody (access=no) or only accessible for some people with permission (access=private)?

I removed the name from the building, and the address from the company node, so they are not duplicated

afaik yes. There's only one sign on the building

They are disappearing :(
... hopefully because people found a better way to make a living

I already added them again, don't worry. Some of these tags are set only to prevent being asked again to other StreetComplete users (like name:signed=no, opening_hours:signed=no, etc.). Many countries have a rule in their traffic code that says that if a bridge is higher than 5 m, there is no need for a sign, so maxheight=default or maxheight:signed=no then means it's higher than 5 m. maxspeed:type=BG:urban is another reference to the traffic law of a country: it used to mean 60 km/h until Bulgaria changed its maxspeed inside towns to 50 km/h. Thanks to tagging it like that, we don't need to change thousands of maxspeed tags when the law is changed.

Hi, I saw that you removed foot=yes and maxheight:signed=no tags where Източна тангента passes under Ботевградско шосе. foot=yes is added by StreetComplete to indicate that a major road without sidewalks is not forbidden for pedestrians. maxheight:signed=no is added to indicate that the bridge has been surveyed for maxheight and there is no sign. Please don't remove these tags.

OK, it's gone

You added the stop 32 СУ Св. Климент Охридски the day after it stopped working according to a sign on the stop (see note I placed there). Why?

Or even better: node/11684153749

See for instance node/11947857741

If it's a branch of UBB then you can just search for ОББ in iD: it will find the brand preset from NSI that includes all names, wikidata link, etc. But I understand that here it's the head office. You could still search for ОББ but then manually change amenity=bank into office=company, and add wikipedia=https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9E%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0 to that node. There's no need to create a relation.

This changeset is being discussed here
Тази редакция се обсъжда тук
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/131807

I tried to create MPs by adding an area, assigning it with role inner, and assigned role outer to the building. Apparently that's not the way to do it. Please feel free to repair my work. That these buildings have inner courtyards is info from cadastre