OpenStreetMap
SekeRob's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 179936498 | Hi, Are you sure this is the residential area and not the administrative boundary of Monte Mignone as there is an awful lot of farmland included in the area. Let us know as right now the tagging is flagged as incorrect to include a free standing label node cannot be part of a multipolygon cheers |
|
| 179913147 | Hi, Made you tattoo parlor a separate Point of interest from the entrance address and added shop=tattoo to make it visible on the map. cheers |
|
| 179972340 | Hi sscotty71 Don't know for whom you made these wetland tags on viewpoints, renamed a street as seeming some walking route and used generic names like scene 1, 2, 3, 4 but these have no place on Openstreetmap. I have undone them. If these were for same external project, then I suggest u look and umap to store this and use it for you project. I've copied this comment to one of change sets to for public awareness cheers |
|
| 100339208 | Hi ivanbranco Followed your suggestion and applied the species: prefix. Oddly with the recently added wikidata/pedia JOSM plugin it jumped me to Q721 which has the comment that the tag is a zoo,
Cheers
PS, it could be a (plant) zoo, as asking in a different way gave another wikidata link, but same picture.
|
|
| 179572126 | Hi, Quale e i typo del Caritas social_facility=? ... group home, shelter, nursing home... Ciao |
|
| 140641359 | I'll let them be. Think most of the green is shrubby/scrubby in these zones
|
|
| 179795533 | Now Broken,
|
|
| 140641359 | Hi dp7 You may have seen me going around mapping a lot in this region and splitting up forests with too many members. Today while 3 way splitting a 413 member one with countless small 'outer' sections too, stumbled on many scree areas that were not made 'inner'. Was that to be done or is there a 'for rendering' reason (something a mapper acknowledged up in the Alps/Dolomites.... all these zones seem to have more or less scrub growing in them of low to medium coverage. Cheers
|
|
| 152766265 | 3D Bing Sat image of the RAC NW of Chieti Scalo where it splits pointing left lane SS5 and right lane A25. Those markers are fresh paint. https://www.bing.com/maps/search?style=3d&q=Chieti+Scalo&cp=42.340763%7E14.130918&lvl=19.9&eh=98.48 |
|
| 152766265 | Hi, Plz see pictures taken on 06-03-2026 at various points between 216.6 and 241km along the ol Tiburtina Valeria (Don't know where the rest of the conversation went when you proposed to move SR5 to a reg_ref like tag, but the one appearing on the regular map is where the 'ref' tag applies. At about 222 junction near the Megalo
At about 217.5, where you can see the sign had a black S put on (it's always between like that, also my old cloud archive photos from 2021 shows this.
At about 228 just before the Pescara Ovest motorway entrance:
In Santa Teresa connection between the SS602 and SS5 from both directions:
Every single sign and massive road markings on the RAC between Pescara and Chieti it says SS5 Tiburtina or SS5 Popoli. All hectometer markers from 216.6 i.e. 216.VI have been gone since long i.e. one can only go by the direction and destination signs. As written before about the OSM 'on the ground' rule (wiki has just been refreshed) and the short-circuited brainwave of some penpushers, the reversal back to SS5 between any KM between Pescara Porta Nuova and Pratola Preligna is overdue. You can undo your edits or I'll bring in the howitzer reversing tool of JOSM. Where SR5 goes I frankly don't care. It was a paper excersize and far as I remember the story, they did not know how fast to reverse when they realized what the overeagerness would result in. ciao |
|
| 179129415 | Just 1 new roundabout used by 7 routes like the SS16, and long distance flixbuses causing the perverted BBox size. Sorry. |
|
| 179049332 | Looks like a 6th partition is needed, Via Bugiardi a good candidate as a lead along which to split this wood with at least 100 more inner areas to map. |
|
| 177575490 | Hi forcella Please stop mapping ways on top of existing ways (are you importing???). Use the existing ways and add the hiking route relation to those. gscholz and I have been repairing, You can see for instance route 937 which has parts shared with 2 other routes. If you don't know how, ask on the Italian community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60
|
|
| 178021552 | Have changed apron2 to surface=asphalt;concrete where the previous values look like another language {Dutch, German?) The system says there can only be 1 surface value. I can actually go there and see from the side terminal entrance where the gate is always open, public access to rental and parking's. The runway extention of 380 meters has not been opened/commissioned yet. Definitely concrete. |
|
| 178021552 | Hi,
|
|
| 178021552 | Hi,
|
|
| 177385799 | Hi, An observation made last week when something needed fixing here. If seeing it right when you have multiple 'inner' areas sharing sides in e.g. a wood you draw a new outline around those inner areas and make that the inner as kind of an envelope, This is not needed since years as learned from a French mapper and later confirmed by Minh Nguyen, the preeminent OSM guru. Try it, just make all of them directly inner and the software will compute an outline around them in the render process. 1 exception. The 'inner' object must have at least 2 nodes directly facing the 'outer' area. It works but the analysis tools go on tilt for that inner-inner area so I'm still mapping ring around those make that inner but it's needed rarely. Here's a link to an example just done today with 4 sidesharing inner areas inside a larger scrub zone relation/20142671#map=17/41.583563/14.634116
|
|
| 177720820 | Included removal of an old tagless line. |
|
| 177675898 | Well, the render issue is resolved \o/ in multiple forest compartments. |
|
| 173838591 | No idea what you're on about, meantime the drystream tag value is discouraged, and practically out of use since mid 2024, so it will be a revert to stream+intermittent, I.E. the original tags. |